In Santiago’s well-heeled suburbs, Chile’s elite say they’re going through uncertainty after the remainder of the nation voted to ditch the dictatorship-era structure that has served them nicely for many years.

For some, it is a bitter tablet to swallow.

“It’s extremely unsure. We try to maneuver. We try to promote the homes, be as liquid as we are able to in case we’ve to maneuver to a different nation,” stated Aranza, an organization government who declined to offer her full title as a result of she had not mentioned her household’s plan with buddies.

Almost 80 % of Chileans voted to tear up the structure established underneath the 1973-1990 dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, seen as the basis of the South American nation’s jarring inequalities.

Many blamed the structure for a system that has part-privatized public providers, particularly well being care, training and pensions.

Of the 20 % that voted no, most stay within the “golden triangle” of Lo Barnechea, Las Condes and Vitacura in northeastern Santiago, the place the nation’s political and financial energy is concentrated.

– Privileged setting –

These are suburbs of manicured lawns, stylish eating places, glitzy shops and personal colleges, with Porsche, Maserati and Bentley auto dealerships outstanding.

Ana Maria Alvarez Rojas, a social sciences researcher on the Silva Henriquez Catholic College, stated these neighborhoods’ rejection of change was “not stunning.”

“The folks favored by the present financial mannequin don’t wish to lose their privileges. These elites have at all times been reduce off from the folks.

“They’re saying: ‘we wish to proceed like this, we’ve a life we worth,'” she stated, mentioning that almost 90 % of Chile’s richest 1.zero % stay within the three districts.

Conservative President Sebastian Pinera, interviewed after the October 25 vote, acknowledged that the inhabitants of those neighborhoods “stay in a really completely different actuality from the remainder of the nation, which makes them see the world in a different way.”

Story continues

Pinera, a billionaire, is a resident of Las Condes.

In neighboring Lo Barnechea, which hugs the foothills of the Andes with a view of the sprawling metropolis of seven million, 60 % voted to maintain the Pinochet-era structure.

“I work in a public hospital and the hole is big. You possibly can’t think about how briskly folks right here entry well being care,” stated orthopedic surgeon David Daved, 33.

“It is snug, they get what they need, they do not have to attend. Individuals down there,” he stated, indicating town, “have to attend, like for years, they’re handled like animals. I perceive why there are upset.”

He voted towards as a result of “I do know that this won’t assist the considerations that individuals have.”

– Fears for economic system –

It is a widespread theme of the Rechazo (Reject) marketing campaign, {that a} new structure will hurt financial development and that wanted change might be extra simply wrought by amendments to the prevailing constitution.

Alvarez Rojas identified that the unequal manner municipalities are funded went to the center of town’s issues.

Every municipality is given a excessive diploma of monetary autonomy.

Financed by native taxes, the richest communes are naturally higher off.

“There is no such thing as a system of redistribution between municipalities. A typical municipal fund exists, however it’s not efficient. All the advantages are concentrated in privileged municipalities,” she stated.

Municipal expenditure per inhabitant is very revealing. Vitacura’s was about $1,470 (1,260 euros) in 2019, in contrast with $185 in Cerro Navia, a poor northwestern Santiago neighborhood.

“Inequalities had been aggravated underneath the dictatorship, the place segregation was a state coverage,” she stated, including that the vote mirrored a want to show the web page on the Pinochet period as soon as and for all.

The onerous work on changing it has solely simply begun, with Chileans now having to decide on a 155-member conference to draft the structure and what it is going to say.

“A brand new structure coming from the deep violence we had final yr is one thing that isn’t legitimate for me as a result of the federal government determined to do that underneath stress from the streets,” stated a businessman in Lo Barnechea who declined to be named.

“That is an uncertainty. After which let’s examine what sort of structure they put together, in the event that they keep the appropriate to property,” the person in his 50s stated, involved over who will comprise the brand new conference, to be voted on in April.

A pre-referendum opinion ballot carried broadly within the press laid naked the elite’s obvious ignorance of the depth of Chile’s inequalities.

Entitled “Perceptions of inequality by the Chilean elite” the ballot’s 500 respondents stated they believed the poor signify 25 % of the inhabitants, the center class 57 % and the rich 18 %.

Nevertheless, these perceptions are starkly at odds with World Financial institution figures that present the proportion of poor in Chile is 77 %, the center class 20 % and the rich solely 3.zero %.

bur-db/mjs