If the Home of Representatives selects the president, every state would get a single vote – not one vote per Home member. iStock / Getty Photos Plus

If the the 2020 U.S. presidential election is contested, each campaigns are getting ready to take the matter to court docket. However the Founding Fathers meant for Congress to be the backup plan if the Electoral Faculty didn’t produce a winner.

Typically, the framers sought to keep away from congressional involvement in presidential elections. They wished an unbiased govt who might resist ill-considered laws and wouldn’t care about currying favor with members of Congress, as James Ceaser defined in his definitive 1980 textual content, “Presidential Choice.”

That’s why they created the Electoral Faculty, assigning to state legislatures the accountability for selecting “electors” who then decide the president.

However the framers might foresee circumstances – particularly, a fragmented race between little-known politicians – the place no presidential candidate would safe an Electoral Faculty majority. Reluctantly, they assigned the Home of Representatives to step in if that occurred – presumably as a result of because the establishment closest to the folks, it might bestow some democratic legitimacy on a “contingent election.”

Tied or contested election

The founders proved prescient: The elections of 1800 and 1824 didn’t produce winners within the Electoral Faculty and had been determined by the Home. Thomas Jefferson was chosen in 1800 and John Quincy Adams in 1824.

Over time, the event of a two-party system with nationwide nominating conventions – which permits events to dealer coalitions and unite behind a single presidential candidate – has mainly ensured that the Electoral Faculty produces a winner. Although the Electoral Faculty has modified considerably because the 18th century, it has principally saved Congress out of presidential choice.

As a professor who has taught programs on presidential elections for 20 years, nonetheless, I can see eventualities wherein Congress will get concerned within the 2020 election.

A tie within the Electoral Faculty stays a risk, nonetheless distant. There are 538 electors, so a minimal majority to win is 270. The web site 270toWin lists 64 hypothetical eventualities wherein each Joe Biden and Donald Trump might get 269 electors. That will throw the election to the Home.

Although the Home has a Democratic majority, such an consequence would virtually actually profit Trump.

Right here’s why: In a concession to small states involved their voices can be marginalized if the Home was referred to as upon to decide on the president, the founders gave just one vote to every state. Home delegations from every state meet to determine how one can forged their single vote.

That voting process provides equal illustration to California – inhabitants 40 million – and Wyoming, inhabitants 600,000.

Presently, this association favors the Republicans. The GOP dominates the delegations from 26 states – precisely the quantity required to achieve a majority beneath the foundations of Home presidential choice. Nevertheless it’s not the present Home that will determine a contested 2020 election. It’s the newly elected Home that will select the president. So the result is dependent upon congressional races.

Yet one more caveat: Break up selections are thought-about abstentions, so states that can’t attain an settlement can be counted out.

Home Majority Chief Nancy Pelosi is reportedly getting ready for the likelihood that presidential choice leads to the Home.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc by way of Getty Photos

Congressional fee

One other means Congress might change into concerned within the 2020 election is that if there are disputes in regards to the vote totals in varied states. Given the spike in mail-in voting through the pandemic, threats of international interference and controversies over voter suppression, uncertainty after Nov. three appears probably.

Maybe essentially the most related precedent for that state of affairs is the 1876 election between Democrat Samuel Tilden and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. That election noticed disputed returns in 4 states – Florida, South Carolina, Louisiana and Oregon – with a complete of 20 electoral votes.

Excluding these 20 disputed electors, Tilden had 184 pledged electors of the 185 wanted for victory within the Electoral Faculty; Hayes had 165. Tilden was clearly the front-runner – however Hayes would win if all of the contested votes went for him.

Due to a post-Civil Battle rule permitting Congress – learn, Northern Republicans fearful about Black voter suppression – to dispute the vote rely in Southern states and bypass native courts, Congress established a fee to resolve the disputed 1876 returns.

As Michael Holt writes in his examination of the 1876 election, the 15-member fee had 5 Home representatives, 5 senators and 5 Supreme Court docket justices. Fourteen of the commissioners had identifiable partisan leanings: seven Democrats and 7 Republicans. The 15th member was a justice recognized for his impartiality.

Hope of a nonpartisan consequence was dashed when the one neutral commissioner resigned and was changed by a Republican choose. The fee voted alongside celebration strains to present all 20 disputed electors to Hayes.

To stop the Democratic-dominated Senate from derailing Hayes’ single-vote overcome Tilden by refusing to substantiate its determination, Republicans had been compelled to make a deal: Abandon Reconstruction, their coverage of Black political and financial inclusion within the post-Civil Battle South. This paved the way in which for Jim Crow segregation.

Bush v. Gore

The 2000 election presents the one fashionable precedent for contested vote returns.

George W. Bush and Al Gore argued for a month over Bush’s slim, 327-vote benefit in Florida’s second machine recount. After a lawsuit in state courts, this political and authorized battle was determined by the Supreme Court docket in December 2000, in Bush v. Gore.

The scene outdoors the Supreme Court docket, Dec. 11, 2000.

Shawn Thew/AFP by way of Getty Photos

However Bush v. Gore was by no means supposed to set a precedent. In it, the justices explicitly acknowledged “our consideration is proscribed to the current circumstances.” Certainly, the court docket might have concluded that the problems offered had been political, not authorized, and declined to listen to the case.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]

In that case, the Home would have determined the 2000 election. The Electoral Faculty should forged its ballots on the primary Monday after the second Wednesday in December – this yr, Dec. 14. If disputed state vote totals are usually not resolved by six days previous to that date, Congress can step in, beneath the 1887 Electoral Account Act. This might have occurred in 2000, and it’s an conceivable consequence in 2020.

One of the best guess for American democracy, historical past exhibits, is a transparent and decisive victory within the Electoral Faculty, because the framers supposed.

Donald Model is affiliated with Faculty of the Holy Cross Faculty Republicans.