Voting, the appropriate factor to do? Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP by way of Getty Photos

People are being implored by politicians of all stripes to do their democratic obligation on Nov. Three and vote.

Present polling suggests that almost all of these eligible to forged a poll intend to vote. However a bit of the voters received’t – in 2016, round 100 million potential voters determined towards registering their vote.

Many obstacles stop residents from voting, akin to uncertainty about learn how to register or incapacity to get to the polls. However there’s a subset of nonvoters who make a acutely aware alternative to not vote for moral causes.

As a thinker who teaches programs in ethics and political philosophy, I’ve investigated the ethics of not voting.

The three commonest causes I hear are: “I don’t have sufficient data,” “I don’t like several of the candidates,” and “I don’t wish to give this election legitimacy.” It’s price analyzing why, in my opinion, every argument is flawed, and if, given the distinctive circumstances of this 12 months’s election, there’s a minimum of one moral purpose to not vote.

1. Lack of expertise

In accordance with a current examine by the 100 Million Venture, nonvoters are twice as probably as energetic voters to say they don’t really feel they’ve sufficient details about candidates and points to resolve learn how to vote. This group of nonvoters may consider that it’s unethical to vote as a result of they’re uninformed. In “The Ethics of Voting,” political thinker Jason Brennan argues that uninformed residents have an moral obligation to not forged votes, as a result of their uninformed votes can produce outcomes that injury our political system.

The honesty of this group of nonvoters is praiseworthy, particularly compared with overconfident voters who are suffering from what psychologists name the “Dunning-Kruger impact” and wrongly consider that they’re higher knowledgeable than they’re.

However an uninformed voter can repair that drawback, and take away the moral dilemma – and with minimal effort and time. Details about every candidate’s platform is extra accessible than ever. It may be discovered on-line, in print and thru dialog. The issue at present is as an alternative learn how to discover dependable, nonpartisan data. One of many clear advantages of mail-in voting is that it provides voters extra time to fill out their poll fastidiously with out feeling rushed. Whereas finishing the poll at dwelling, they’ll educate themselves about every of the candidates and points.

2. Dislike of the candidates

One other widespread purpose for not voting is dislike of the candidates. In truth, a Pew Analysis examine discovered that 25% of registered nonvoters didn’t vote within the 2016 election due to a “dislike of the candidates or marketing campaign points.” Based mostly on their dislike of each candidates, they discovered themselves unable to vote for both one in good conscience.

What this leaves open, nevertheless, is the query of the place this “dislike” comes from. It’s fairly probably the product of adverse campaigning, which promotes adverse attitudes towards the opposing candidate. In the event you already dislike one social gathering’s candidate, adverse adverts encourage an equally adverse feeling towards the opposite social gathering’s candidate. This implies that adverse marketing campaign promoting carries out a method to depress total voter turnout by making voters dislike each candidates.

However dislike just isn’t a enough purpose for abstaining. The error right here, I consider, is that decisions will not be all the time between a constructive and adverse, a very good and a nasty. Voters usually have to decide on between two good or two dangerous choices. It’s additionally price noting that, along with the highest of the ticket, there are sometimes necessary state and native contests on the poll. Discovering only one candidate or coverage proposal that you just really help can take the time to vote worthwhile. State and native races are typically very shut, so every vote actually could be significant.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter.]

3. Contributing to a corrupt system

Two widespread causes given for not voting are the attitudes that “their vote doesn’t matter” and that “the political system is corrupt,” which collectively account for about 20% of the nonvoting inhabitants, in keeping with the 100 Million Venture’s survey of nonvoters. Voter turnout is commonly interpreted as an indication of public help that establishes political legitimacy. By abstaining, some nonvoters may see themselves as opting out from a corrupt system that produces illegitimate outcomes.

This mind-set is likely to be justified in an authoritarian regime, for instance, which sometimes holds faux elections to exhibit fashionable help. In such a society, abstaining from voting may make a reliable level concerning the absence of open and honest elections. However a 2019 report ranks the U.S. because the 25th most democratic nation, classifying it as a “flawed democracy” however a democracy nonetheless. If democratic elections are reliable and their outcomes are revered, voter abstention within the U.S. has no sensible influence that might distinguish it from voter apathy.

All three of the above arguments fail, for my part, as a result of they measure the price of voting primarily when it comes to its outcomes. Voting could or could not yield the result people need, however with out it, there is no such thing as a democratic society.

4. Nonetheless …

Within the present context of the pandemic, there’s one legitimate moral purpose for not voting, a minimum of not in individual. On Election Day, if you’re identified with COVID-19 or have comparable signs or are quarantined, then you need to actually not present as much as the polls. The great of your vote can be outweighed by the potential hurt of exposing different voters to the virus. In fact, as people we can not know now whether or not we’ll discover ourselves in that place on Election Day. However as a society we are able to predict {that a} important proportion of the inhabitants will discover themselves exactly in that scenario at the moment.

Realizing it will occur, voters have to undertake what ethicists name “the precautionary precept.” This precept says individuals ought to take steps to keep away from or scale back harms to others, akin to risking their life or well being.

Based mostly on the precautionary precept, an ethicist might argue that people must request absentee ballots, if their state offers this feature. And in flip, the precautionary precept requires that every state ought to make absentee or mail-in ballots obtainable to all registered voters. We must always defend ourselves and all different residents from having to decide on between their well being and their voting rights.

Scott Davidson doesn’t work for, seek the advice of, personal shares in or obtain funding from any firm or organisation that might profit from this text, and has disclosed no related affiliations past their tutorial appointment.